They aren't equivalent
<h2>Explanation:</h2>
In order to determine whether the expression:

is equivalent to:

Genevieve needs to follow these steps:
Step 1. Get rid parentheses

Step 2. Combine like terms

Step 3. Solve

So:

Therefore, these two expressions aren't equivalent.
<h2>Learn more:</h2>
Writing expressions: brainly.com/question/13894833#
#LearnWithBrainly
Order the following integers from least to greatest.-41, -53, -73, -78 A. -78, -53, -73, -41 B. -78, -73, -41, -53 C. -73, -78,
irakobra [83]
The value of negative integers decreases the further we get from the 0 point on the number line.
Therefore, if we arrange the numbers in ascending order ignoring the negative sign, the numbers will be in descending order when the negative sign is included.
By the definition above, we can say that the smallest number of the lot is -78 and the largest one is -41.
The numbers can be ordered from least to greatest as shown below:

OPTION D is the correct answer.
Answer:
66.5
Step-by-step explanation:
38/2 = 19
114/6 = 19
19 x 3.5 = 66.5
Answer:
(assuming simple interest)
I'll setup the problem and you can do the computation
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula for simple interest:
I = P*r*t
P = deposits
r = interest rate per period (a year)
t = number of periods
P = Php 23,200
r = 0.06
t = 1
If you have questions, send me a comment