Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
The answer that best completes the statement above is POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT IN OPERANT CONDITIONING. From the term itself operant conditioning, this is when behavior is being controlled or influenced by a certain consequence. Operant conditioning can be of different types such as positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, positive punishment, and negative punishment. In Jennifer's case, this can be classified as positive reinforcement since the stimulus being used encourages her to do the same action again in the future.
Answer:he can help his audience understand the concept further by defining example
Explanation:
An example explains and support your speech because people can actually grasp what you are talking about if you can give them examples otherwise your speech becomes an idea they can only understand in words but can not put into action or see practically.
Examples give weight to your speech cause it can grasp people's attention as they start to practically see what you are talking about.
The true statement regarding the power relationship between the federal government and the states is that the power of the federal government over state governments has increased over time. The answer to your question is A. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
