Answer:
Restate the overall purpose of the experiment. (Why did you do this experiment? What did it teach you?)
2. What were the major findings? (summarize the data you collected)
3. Was the hyposthesis supported by the data? (state your hypothesis and explain how your data relates to your hypothesis)
4. How could this experiment be improved? (If you did this again what could you do differently?)
5. What could be studied next after this experiment? (What else could you test to help you better understand this topic
Explanation:
Actually, it is both acquired and part of your DNA. There is a logical <span>explanation but you have to figure that out on your own.</span>
The scientific method is a process of steps in order to get a conclusion. First, a scientist will observe something. It could be really anything. Then he/she will ask themselves a question. Like how does it do that? Or why does it do that?
Then they will form a hypothesis. This is where you will ask yourself what will be the outcome of the experiment.
Next you actually perform the experiment. If the experiment comes out as your hypothesis predicted, then you accept your hypothesis.
If not, you reject your hypothesis.
Of course, in science you just don't do one experiment. You do it multiple times and even with different circumstances.
Depending on the structure of cells (shapes and organelles) we can differentiate cells and therefore create different groups and classifications based on their differences and functions.
The eukaryote-prokaryote division bases itself on the possesion of a nucleus that creates a boundary for the genetic materifal. In this case, eukaryotes have it while prokaryotes don't.
Hope it helped,
BiologiaMagister