Answer:
South Carolina Ordinance of Nullification, Nov 24, 1832.How was this ordinance a defense of state's rights?
<u>Federal taxes on imports cannot be imposed if the state considers the actions unconstitutional.</u>
What 1828 political party rejected the national bank and supported the presidential campaign of Andrew Jackson?
<u>Democratic Party.</u>
Explanation:
The United States imposed a series of tariffs in the early 19th century to protect and promote US industries over European ones. The most important of these was the Tariff of 1828. While these tariffs benefited the northern industrial states, the agrarian southern ones suffered the most as they imported most of their manufactured products. When president Andrew Jackson failed to significantly change the tariffs in 1832, South Carolina reacted by issuing the "Ordinance of Nullification" in November 24, 1832, declaring the tariffs null and void in the state. <u>They considered that any actions that were against the constitution, such as the federal taxes on imports, can be rendered void by states.</u> The federal government prepared to intervene by force in the state, but the revised Compromise Tariff of 1833 was considered good enough by South Carolina, ending the crisis.
The Democratic Party arose as a result of a split of the old Democratic-Republican Party, as the Democratic faction led by Andrew Jackson sought a party that was based on Jefferson's ideas and closer to the "common man". It opposed slavery and the establishment of a national bank .
B)<span>Creek leaders executed McIntosh because he made the agreement without their consent.
</span>
Answer:
Science and technology have had a major impact on society, and their impact is growing. ... By making life easier, science has given man the chance to pursue societal concerns such as ethics, aesthetics, education, and justice; to create cultures; and to improve human conditions.
Explanation:
Hope this helps~ :D
They are chinese so guess noodles or rice or chicken or something
Gibbons v. Ogden is the first of many cases that has sought to define the role of Congress in regulating commerce, and the degree to which the federal government can use the Commerce Clause to legislate business practices.
The decision in Fletcher v. Peck expanded the parameters of judicial review, as it marked the first time the Supreme Court struck down a state law as unconstitutional.
