Answer and explanation:
Normative ethics is a branch of ethics that reflects on what is morally right and what is wrong. It is through that reflection that principles for human behavior are established.
- <em>"Normative ethics, that part of moral philosophy, or ethics, concerned with criteria of what is morally right and wrong". (Quoted from Britannica, link is the following: https://www.britannica.com/topic/normative-ethics)</em>
In the other hand, metha-ethics is a branch of ethics that studies metaphysical concepts regarding morality and with special emphasis if these moral values are independent of humans.
- <em>"Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words". (Quoted from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, link is the following: https://www.iep.utm.edu/metaethi/) </em>
<em />
The main difference between these two branches of philosophy/ethics is that normative ethics main focus is the morality on a certain action, whereas metaethics focus is morality itself.
Answer:
I think that they definatley should have handled it better and been more respectful.
Explanation:
Answer:
Absolutism.
Explanation:
As the exercise briefly explains, the absolutist belief states that there are no matters of opinion in ethics since moral judgments are the same for everyone, and your own are correct. That is, that there is a general moral system which involves only one truth. All in all, this system states that there is only one absolute reality, truth or morality.
Answer:
it was to register voters across the South in order for African Americans to gain political power.
Explanation:
but Many African Americans who attempted to vote were also threatened physically or feared losing their jobs because by voting they had fears of whether or not people would judge them or look at them differently and they could possibly lose their jobs plus they were colored people so it was also difficult as well.
Hope this helps you!
