National Republican Party, U.S. political party formed after what had been the Republican (or Jeffersonian Republican) party split in 1825. The Jeffersonian Republicans had been the only national political party following the demise of the Federalists during the War of 1812. During the contested election of 1824, followers of Henry Clay and John Quincy Adams began calling themselves National Republicans, while backers of Andrew Jackson emerged as Democratic Republicans. By the election of 1828, the Jacksonians were simply called Democrats, though the name was not formalized until later. Opponents of Jackson joined the National Republican coalition and nominated Adams for a second term. Adams lost, but the National Republicans grew stronger. In 1831 they nominated Henry Clay to run on a platform endorsing the tariff, internal improvements, and the Bank of the United States.
Jackson and the Democrats won an overwhelming victory in the election of 1832, and the National Republicans never nominated another presidential candidate. During Jackson’s second administration, the National Republicans joined with northern and southern conservatives, supporters of the Bank of the United States, and other anti-Jackson groups to form a new coalition. Claiming Jackson governed as “King Andrew I,” the new party called itself the Whigs—after the British party that had opposed the power of the monarchy. By about 1834, there was little trace of the National Republican Party.
I hope this helped. If it did I suggest going onto a site called Quillbot.com. This particular site will take what I just wrote and paraphrase it, so it will look and sound like your work all along. Have a good day!!
Answer:
Correct answer is C. Dividing China's history based on which dynasty ruled the country.
Explanation:
Option C is the only correct answer as we create periodization to divide history into quantified time blocks of time, with a goal to easily research what has happened in the past. Therefore dividing history of China according to the periods of reign of certain countries is one way of periodization.
Option A is not correct as this refers to the ways how someone measured time, not how he created periodization of certain periods and events.
Option B is not correct as this is description of historical events, not periodization of those events.
Last option is also not correct as it shows different accounts of certain historical events, not their periodization.
if it was local an non government afflicting it would be in a state trial
Factory owners agreed to increase worker's wages and shorten the work week.
i think this is the answer
please mark me as brainlyist
i believe that the first step is to accept as true only what is indubitable i think now 'im not positive but i think
