Answer:
What they mean is if you substitute the value given for x into the equation given, is the math statement true.
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Is x = -3 a solution to 6x + 4 = -12?
6(-3) + 4 = -18 + 4 = - 14, so no, for number 1, x = -3 is not a solution to 6x + 4 = -12
Make sense?
LMK if you need me to run the rest of them with you.
Subtract 2 from 12. 12-2 is 10. You can subtract 10 with 4, and then add 2. (10-4)+2=8.
5x-7
If the first side is just x, then the second side must be 2x-5, or 5 less than twice the first. If this is the second side, then the third must be 2x-2, because the third side "measures 3 more than the second side."
The perimeter is 5x-7 = (x) + (2x-5) + (2x-2).
Answer:
a) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is greater than 642.
Step-by-step explanation:
since in the question it is mentioned that the average attendance at games should be more 642 and according to this he moving the team with a larger stadium. Also the hypothesis conducted and the conclusion would be failure to deny the null hypothesis
So here the conclusion that should be made in non-technical term is that there should be no enough proof in order to support the claim that the mean attendence is more than $642
Considering the graph of the cube root parent function, it is found that the correct statement is given by:
D. It is always increasing.
<h3>When a function is increasing?</h3>
A function is increasing when the vertical axis of the graph gets higher as we move the horizontal axis from left to right.
In this problem, the above statement is true for the entire function, hence option D is correct.
More can be learned about functions at brainly.com/question/25537936
#SPJ1
