not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
The definition of prison capacity that she most likely choose to use to write an article on prison overcrowding in the U.S and wants to use the estimate that shows the highest amount of overcrowding is design capacity.
The amount of inmates a jail was intended to house is referred to as design capacity. When prisons are constructed, the level of security required for the facility is reflected in the design of the building.
The layout of the housing units, the construction of the walls and boundaries enclosing the facility, and the materials used to build the prison are all governed by the level of security. Additionally, to accommodate more inmates often more than the jail was intended to hold correctional facilities frequently turn to bunk beds.
The ability of a prison to accommodate inmate movement must also be taken into consideration. Controlling inmate mobility from cells to any other area of the facility presents one of the biggest security issues in prison administration. Therefore, the prison's layout must make movement as straightforward and secure as possible. When a jail is overcrowded, overall safety is significantly compromised.
To learn more about design capacity please click on the given link: brainly.com/question/15569543
#SPJ4
the government provides {goods and services} that {individuals/businesses} acting ... types of public goods and services provided by the local state and federal.
Answer:
English often serves as a lingua franca throughout South and Southeast Asia because the British established their powers and rules over the south and South East Asia. After World War 2, France became a lingua franca
Answer:
See explanation below.
Explanation:
It is clear that a person who kills a member of his or her family is considered by the law to be a murder. However, society views can differ.
When it comes to a murder, people tend to perceive a person who kills a stranger as much more dangerous than a person who kills a member of his/her family. This can occur because, in their minds, when someone kills a stranger, society tends to think that they are at risk too. On the other side, when a person kills someone of his/her family society feels safe thinking it couldn't have been them the ones who could have got killed.
