Answer:
2x-7
Step-by-step explanation:
Oh Foxy, Foxy, how totally debilitated you must be ! Try to relax. Nobody
enjoys a painful brain, and believe me, this problem is not worth it.
Let me put it to you this way: What if the problem said . . .
-- Demarcus has $8 more than his sister.
-- His sister has $4.
-- How much money ' M ' does Demarcus have ?
If your brain didn't hurt, you could quickly solve this right in there.
You would know that Demarcus' money ' M ' = 8 + 4 .
That's <em>almost </em>exactly what the problem <em>does</em> say.
Except it doesn't say he has "$8 more than his sister",
it says he has "at least" that much.
So you know that ' M ' is not exactly = 8 + 4, but that's the <u>least</u> it could be.
The actual amount of ' M ' is <u>more</u> than that.
Surely you can handle it from here, even with half of your brain
tied behind your back.
Take a good hard look at ' A ', and then go lie down.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
linear model
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a linear function. The initial value is 20 ft, and the yearly growth is 2ft/yr. Thus, the function is
height(t) = (20 ft) + (2 ft/yr)t, where t is the number of years.
Answer:
1. The equation represent an exponential decay
2. The rate of the exponential decay is -3×2.5ˣ·㏑(2.5)
Step-by-step explanation:
When a function a(t) = a₀(1 + r)ˣ has exponential growth, the logarithm of x grows with time such that;
log a(t) = log(a₀) + x·log(1 + r)
Hence in the equation -3 ≡ a₀, (1 + r) ≡ 2.5 and y ≡ a(t). Plugging in the values in the above equation for the condition of an exponential growth, we have;
log y = log(-3) + x·log(2.5)
Therefore, since log(-3) is complex, the equation does not represent an exponential growth hence the equation represents an exponential decay.
The rate of the exponential decay is given by the following equation;
Hence the rate of exponential decay is -3×2.5ˣ × ㏑(2.5)
