1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
slega [8]
3 years ago
14

One major difference between civil and criminal cases is that:

Law
1 answer:
adoni [48]3 years ago
8 0
C. Only criminal cases are decided by a jury
You might be interested in
If your wife dies from child birth can you press charges on the baby
prohojiy [21]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Its the babies fault, they had to big of a head to get through her cooter, so he/she killed her!

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At the age of 13 my mother planned to get married and change mine and my 8 year old brothers last name to Smith and i hated that
goblinko [34]

Answer:

<h3>I don't think so</h3>

Explanation:

Your 13 and your a teenager you are not that mature . Maybe your mom has some kind of problem that's why she did that . or if you don't like it you should talk about it with your mom .

4 0
2 years ago
Learning reality, responsible behavior, and the ability to distinguish right from wrong
Kryger [21]

Answer:

whats the question?

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
7. Section of the brief where the issues are analyzed through citation of<br> legal authorities?
BlackZzzverrR [31]

Answer:

to see if there are subsequent legal authorities that invalidate your case and ... For most cases that you cite in your documents, it is fine to rely on one service. ... critical to your analysis, you would be wise to run it through a second citator ... reversed/overruled/superseded in part, or sometimes the issue on ...

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
What is one thing the Federal Government system can do to ease Mass Incarceration?
Trava [24]

Answer:

*Eliminate prison for lower-level crimes

Explanation: Prison is often the default criminal justice sanction when someone breaks the law. It shouldn’t be that way. For those who commit a lower-level crime like drug possession, petty theft, or selling marijuana, prison is not just unfair, it is also a bad sanction for society at large.Prison costs $31,000 a year per prisoner, and often does little to prevent re-offense for these crimes. Probation, treatment, or community service are all more appropriate for many lower-level crimes, not to mention much cheaper (probation is 10 times less expensive). State legislatures and Congress should change sentencing laws to make alternatives to prison the default penalty for certain lower-level crimes, like drug possession and petty theft.

*Reduce sentence minimums and maximums currently on the books

Explanation: If someone commits a serious crime, like robbery, they should be punished. But there’s little evidence that staying in prison for such long periods of time, such as the 20 or 30-year sentences imposed, will rehabilitate prisoners. In fact, research indicates that longer stays in prison do not lead to lower recidivism. Sometimes, longer stays can even increase recidivism. With prison stays growing longer each year, lawmakers should consider reducing the time many inmates spend behind bars when it’s not necessary. State and federal legislatures should reduce the minimum and maximum sentencing guidelines, and make them more proportional to the crimes committed. We suggest in the report that legislators consider a 25 percent cut as a starting point for the six major crimes (aggravated assault, drug trafficking, murder, non-violent weapons offenses, robbery and serious burglary) that make up the bulk of the nation’s current prison population. This will make our system smarter while still protecting public safety.

*Prosecutors should seek lower penalties when appropriate

Explanation: Prosecutors should use their discretion to implement the recommendations in our report. Their sentencing recommendations should not simply aim to put defendants behind bars for the longest time possible. The best way to keep us all safe is for prosecutors to seek the most proportional punishment – one that fits the crime — not simply the harshest one.

*Eliminate “Three Strikes Laws” and “Truth in Sentencing”

Explanation: Both policies take away the ability of judges to properly asses the appropriate sentence for defendants in the criminal justice system. We should trust our judges to make these decisions instead of forcing an inappropriate sentence with set-in-stone rules.

*Reinvest savings into crime prevention polices

Explanation: The recommendations in the recent Brennan Center report would save almost $20 billion dollars a year. We should reinvest those savings into police, schools, and reentry programs, which will help improve public safety even more. $20 billion could cover 270,000 police officers, 327,000 teachers, or 360,000 probation officers. Most experts agree that these investments better prevent crime than prison.

^^ here are a few :)

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who served as the first<br>chief justice of the Supreme<br>Court​
    13·2 answers
  • What are financial duties
    10·1 answer
  • 1 What does "You have the right to remain silent" mean? A You have the right to free speech B You don't have to testify against
    13·1 answer
  • Give me 10 things you would need for insurance and why
    10·1 answer
  • According to captain Cochran, undercover operations are A.) Proactive B.) Reactive C.) Excessive D.) Insufficient
    13·1 answer
  • What is special crime investigation​
    8·2 answers
  • Kaakibat na tungkulin pumili ng lider na ihahalal <br>​
    6·1 answer
  • Here is the information Jordan has found about several different arson charges.
    6·1 answer
  • True or false: A test has much less utility when it predicts performance that is distributed as a power law.
    13·1 answer
  • 6
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!