Answer:
It's best to invest in the second economy
Explanation:
The question does not provide information on the hypothetical economic expectations of the two economies, but as a risk-averse investor, it's a better idea to try to "spread" the risk instead of concentrating it.
In the first economy, conditions might or might not be good. If they are good, returns will be extraordinary because all stocks will provide good returns, but if conditions take a turn for the worse, all stocks prices will fall and the financial consequences will be catastrophic.
In the second economy, results might never be as good as in the first economy, but they also will not ever be as bad. The risk is spread between various stocks, and while some may fall in price, others will rise, and viceversa. For a risk-adverse investor, this a far better option.
Metal X can dispose of unwanted materials quicker and is therefore a better reactant. Please mark Brainliest!!!
Answer: The correct option is C.
Explanation: From the scenario given above, we can see that Thomas has not shown any intention to replace the expensive team members, the only option in this case would then be to properly utilize their expertise to the advantage of the company.
In order to do this therefore, a SWOT analysis would need to be carried out and utilized in gaining an edge over the competition.
In this case, Thomas would make sure that the expertise of all his team members are brought to bare, the company would analyze the competition to see where it is lacking in customer satisfaction, and then try to gain the upper hand by including features in their product that the competition does not have in theirs.
This strategy will help in achieving a competitive advantage.
