Answer:
a-1. The present value of Plan 1 = $93.08
a-2. The deal 2 which involves paying immediately adn taking the 10% discount is better.
Explanation:
a-1.
The interest rate of 5% is taken as the discount rate to convert future cash flows into the present value.
The First payment plan with installments has a present value of,
Present Value-Plan 1 = 25 + 25/1.05 + 25/1.05² + 25/1.05³ = $93.08
a-2.
The first plan will cost $93.08 in the present value.
The second plan will involve immediate payment and a discount of 10%vwhch makes the present value of plan 2 as $90 (100 - (100*0.1)).
Thus, the second deal or deal involving immediate payment and taking the discount is better.
Morgan will get $1600 with the process of simple interest.
<h3>what is simple interest?</h3>
Simple interest is calculated based on a loan's principal or the initial deposit into a savings account. Simple interest doesn't compound, therefore a creditor will only charge interest on the principal sum, and a borrower will never be required to pay further interest on the interest that has already accrued.
Rate of interest = 12%
principal = $1000
Time = 5 years
Simple interest
![=\frac{1000 \times 5 \times 12}{100}\\=600](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%5Cfrac%7B1000%20%5Ctimes%205%20%5Ctimes%2012%7D%7B100%7D%5C%5C%3D600)
Now amount = 1000+600 = 1600.
Therefore, Morgan will get $1600.
To learn more about simple interest from the given link
brainly.com/question/25793394
#SPJ4
Under Price discrimination, an organization compares a few dimensions of its performance to that of another company, be it a competitor or in a totally distinctive industry.
Charge discrimination is a promoting method that fees clients one-of-a-kind charges for the same products or services based on what the seller thinks they can get the patron to comply with. In natural price discrimination, the vendor fees every customer the most fee they'll pay.
Charge discrimination refers to charging distinct clients special costs for the same true carrier. The Sherman Antitrust Act, Clayton Antitrust Act, and Robinson-Patman Act outlaw price discrimination while the intent of that discrimination is to harm competitors.
Price discrimination in a monopoly is a practice of charging extraordinary costs for an equal product. Monopolies generally have extra control over providers than ordinary sellers, which means that they can notably impact the providers' promoting prices.
Learn more about Price discrimination here: brainly.com/question/23342760
#SPJ4
Answer:
Price competition in a monopolistically competitive market
Explanation:
The Monopolistic rivalry is an industry state with several firms that are closely linked to each other but offer distinct goods. Therefore, this sector has unlimited entry and exit
Here the company offers the same service but there are totally different in terms of design, service, quality, etc
Hence, the correct option is c