Answer:
The main opponents of Napoleon was Britain, and later joined by Austrio-Hungary, Germany, the Russian Empire, and many other smaller nations.
These countries felt a need to oppose France under Napoleon, for they themselves had monarch governments, and on seeing the French Revolution that led to the capitulation of the Royal government and civil unrest, which led to the rise of (what they thought) was a fanatical Bonaparte, they believed that, if their own people took a hold of the ways of the French, that they themselves would be thrown out of power. This led to the governments of these other nations to band together to throw Bonaparte out and reinstate the royal family to re-balance the royal structure in Europe.
~
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The significance of having three branches of government is tremendous and can't be overemphasized. Some of the significance includes:
1. It makes the government effective and efficient.
2. Having three branches of government protects the rights of the citizens
3. It prevents arbitrary use of power by the government
Are there advantages if the responsibility to govern is shouldered only by one branch?
No there are no advantages. If any branch of government turned has all the power of the executive, judiciary, and legislative there will eventually be an arbitrary use of power in the long run, and this will affect the citizens and that society at large. This has been proven in human history in the past in the case of the dictator and absolute monarchy.
The last five decades of the twentieth century witnessed the transformation of Texas from a rural and agricultural state to an urban, industrial one.
Statement of U.S. foreign policy toward China. Issued by U.S. secretary of state John Hay (1899), the statement reaffirmed the principle that all countries should have equal access to any Chinese port open to trade.
Answer:
They both believe in one spiritual being which is the Lord which is called monotheism.
Explanation: May I have brainliest please?
