The Boston Port Act, the first of the laws passed in 1774 in response to the Boston Tea Party, closed the port of Boston until the colonists paid for the destroyed tea and until the king was satisfied that order had been restored. Colonists objected that the Port Act punished all of Boston rather than just the individuals who had destroyed the tea and that they were being punished without having been given an opportunity to testify in their own defense.
The Massachusetts Government Act provoked, even more, outrage than the Port Act because it unilaterally took away Massachusetts' charter and brought it under control of the British government. Under the terms of the Government Act, almost all positions in the colonial government were to be appointed by the governor, Parliament, or king. The act also severely limited the activities of town meetings in Massachusetts to one meeting a year, unless the Governor called for one. Colonists outside Massachusetts feared that their governments could now also be changed by the legislative fiat of Parliament.
The Administration of Justice Act allowed the Royal governor to order that trials of accused royal officials take place in Great Britain or elsewhere within the Empire if he decided that the defendant could not get a fair trial in Massachusetts. Although the act stipulated for witnesses to be reimbursed after having traveled at their own expense across the Atlantic, it was not stipulated that this would include reimbursement for lost earnings during the period for which they would be unable to work, leaving few with the ability to testify. George Washington called this the "Murder Act" because he believed that it allowed British officials to harass Americans and then escape justice. Many colonists believed the act was unnecessary because British soldiers had been given a fair trial following the Boston Massacre in 1770.
The Salvation Army was the program founded in 1880 by a Methodist minister in London.
The answer to your question is: <span>Little is known in detail about the societal structure of the ancient Indus Valley inhabitants, because their writings have not been deciphered as of 2014. However, archaeologists have made many discoveries that suggest Indus society was highly egalitarian with a centralized government. Statues and art from that time suggest a high degree of equality with regional leaders forming a central authority.</span>
Answer:
1.They wanted state governments to serve as a check on the national government.2.They recognized that the national government had too little power under the Articles of Confederation.
Explanation:
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The answer is FALSE.
Suppose you need to select a bank, then we will select a type of bank which has a branch near to your place so that it is convenient for you to reach.
Also while selecting a bank you will consider the fact that the bank will keep your money secure and will return your money.
Thus a person who is selecting a bank will consider the security of their return.
