Q: Marci wants to prove that the diagonals of
1 answer:
Answer: Option B
She should use the fact that the
opposite sides of a parallelogram are
congruent and then use the
Pythagorean theorem.
We cannot use the diagonals of square property because this is a rectangle, opposite angles will also not work, and we cannot use the diagonal property because thats what we have to prove.
Must click thanks and mark brainliest
You might be interested in
The answer to this equation would be -8/35
Answer:
-8-(-1)-5
Step-by-step explanation:
(Hope this helps can I pls have brainlist (crown) ☺️)
I think the answer is B! I hope that helps!!!!!
BRAINLY would be appreciated❤️
To the nearest hundred thousandths: 200,000 To the nearest ten-thousandths: 210,000 To the nearest thousands: 206,000
━━━━━━━☆☆━━━━━━━
▹ Answer
<em>q = 16</em>
▹ Step-by-Step Explanation
3(q - 7) = 27
3q - 21 = 27
Add 21 to both sides:
21 + 21 = na
27 + 21 = 48
3q = 48
Divide both sides by 3:
3/3 = q
48/3 = 16
q = 16
Hope this helps!
CloutAnswers ❁
━━━━━━━☆☆━━━━━━━