Well... to solve use rise over run... that is to find the slope,
now to find the y-intercept you look at what coordinate crosses the y-axis.
y= (what you got for the slope Ex. 1/2)x + (the y-intercept)
Figure it out and you got the answer with just a bit of help!!!
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The answer would be 49 I think hehe
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
d) intersecting, but not perpendicular lines
Step-by-step explanation:
Changing the sign of one of the variable terms causes the line to be reflected across one of the axes. The slope is the opposite of what it was. Since the original slope was not 1 or -1, the resulting line is not perpendicular to it. Lines with different slopes will be intersecting.
The two lines are intersecting, but not perpendicular.
I believe the given limit is
![\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty} \bigg(\sqrt[3]{3x^3+3x^2+x-1} - \sqrt[3]{3x^3-x^2+1}\bigg)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20%5Clim_%7Bx%5Cto%5Cinfty%7D%20%5Cbigg%28%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B3x%5E3%2B3x%5E2%2Bx-1%7D%20-%20%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B3x%5E3-x%5E2%2B1%7D%5Cbigg%29)
Let

Now rewrite the expression as a difference of cubes:

Then

The limit is then equivalent to

From each remaining cube root expression, remove the cubic terms:



Now that we see each term in the denominator has a factor of <em>x</em> ², we can eliminate it :


As <em>x</em> goes to infinity, each of the 1/<em>x</em> ⁿ terms converge to 0, leaving us with the overall limit,
