Answer:
Cost of goods sold to be reported in consolidated financial statement = $1,000,000
Explanation:
Whenever there is 100% or more than 50% holding in a company, then equity method is followed under which all of the items are to be consolidated, but in case where there are inter transfers that is transfer from holding to subsidiary or vice-versa then such transactions, profit not realized is to be eliminated.
In case where inventory is transferred to subsidiary after adding profit by holding company, then in case if that inventory is sold to third party by year end then entire profit is recognized even the profit added by holding to cost of goods sold to subsidiary.
Where in case such inventory is not sold further by subsidiary to third party and is still held in the stock then such profit added on sale by holding to subsidiary is eliminated.
In our case the entire inventory is sold to third party by the year end.
Therefore, entire profit will be recognized and cost of goods sold to be shown in consolidated financial statements = $600,000 + $400,000 = $1,000,000.
Answer:
c. cost-leadership strategy
Explanation:
Contour Autos tend to decrease the price of the product and that the quality served of the product is acceptable and not degraded. In this manner as against the normal industry the company supplies same quality goods at lower prices.
This decreases the cost for consumers and therefore, it is termed as Cost-Leadership strategy.
The Company tends to lead in the market through lower cost of goods supplied with the same quality.
Answer: $2.78
Explanation:
Average variable cost is calculated by dividing the total variable cost of producing a certain number of units of a good by that same number of units.
Average variable cost = Variable cost of producing 18 sneakers / 18
= 50 / 18
= 2.7778
= $2.78
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete because it does not attach the model to answer it we can comment on the following.
The problem is that Jamal, trying to increase profits, decided to sell two different products that are not part of the Subway products. When the franchisor visited Jamal's location, it realized the changes and set an ultimatum to Jamal to respect the franchise agreement.
The cause of the problem is that although Jamal wanted to diversify the products to have more income, this contradicts and is against the franchise agreement he signed when he bought the Subway franchise. The contract clearly states that the owner of the franchise can only sell products authorized in the contract by Subway. That is exactly one of the characteristics of a franchise. That you visit one of them any place in the world, and you are going to find de the same products with the same quality. That is the product guarantee of a franchise like Subway.
So the effects for the company are that its reputation an image can be questioned for selling different products that are hot approved by Subway. It is a major risk the company is not going to allow. Furthermore, it is stated in the contract. So Jamal has no right to break it.
One possible solution is that Jamal respects those 30 days to make the proper corrections, follow the guidelines established in the Subway's manuals, offer a sincere apology, and commit himself to operate the franchise just as it is stated on the agreement.
Answer:
May 2 No entry is required as the transaction is yet to happen
May 7 DR Accounts Receivable $1,200
CR Tour Revenue $1,200
May 9 DR No entry required
May 15 DR Sales Allowance (1,200 * 30%) $360
CR Accounts Receivable $360
May 20 DR Cash $789.60
DR Sales Discount $50.40
CR Accounts Receivable $840
Working
Accounts Receivable = 1,200 - 360 sales allowance = $840
Sales Discount = 840 * 6% discount = $50.40
Cash = 840 - 50.40 = $789.60
b. Net Revenues
= Revenue - Sales allowance - Sales discount
= 1,200 - 360 - 50.40
= $789,60
c. Partial Income Statement
Tour Revenues $1,200
Less:
Sales Allowance $360
Sales Discount <u> $50.60 </u>
<u> ($410.60)</u>
Net Tour Revenue $789.40
