Answer:
if we explain what is trafficking of persons in our own understanding, it can be said as Human trafficking is the illegal and inhuman actions and processes of using people for commercially beneficial activities through means such as kidnapping, threat and coercion. most of the people that fall victim for this are socially and economically underprivileged people in a population.
Following is the standard definition of the US State Department.
"Human trafficking can include, but does not require, movement. People may be considered trafficking victims regardless of whether they were born into a state of servitude, were exploited in their hometown, were transported to the exploitative situation, previously consented to work for a trafficker, or participated in a crime as a direct result of being trafficked."
the three most common and major forms of human trafficking that can be seen are,
- Sex Trafficking
- Forced Labour
- Bondage Debt
Explanation:
They were related because they believed in more then one god. Polytheism is the belief in more then one god, while a Ziggurat is the temple where the religious rituals would go on.
Hope I helped!
Answer:
d. Americans were allowed to bring their slaves into Texas.
Explanation:
American settlers who were allowed by the Mexican Government to settle into Texas were demanded to covert to Catholicism, to swear loyalty to the Mexican Government, and even to change their names to the respective spanish equivalent (for example <em>Jorge </em>for George, or <em>Enrique </em>for Henry). In exchange for fulfilling all these conditions, they were granted free land.
However, they were not allowed to bring their slaves with them, simply because Mexico had forbidden slavery in 1829, more than two decades earlier than the United States. Slavery was forbbiden in all of the Mexican territory, and as long mas Texas remained a part of Mexico, the settlers could not expand the slave economy that was paramount in the Deep South.
Answer:
a)
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Piaget might say that Darnell was assimilating the comb into his existing schemes. Meaning that Darnell was using the what he knows about other things to determine what the comb is/does. Such as using his senses, which in this case he decided to taste the comb.
