La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Los ejemplos de poca corresponsabilidad de los Colombianos en cuanto al gobierno nacional y sus acciones para gobernarnos serían los siguientes.
1.- La sociedad exige mucho en términos generales, pero no se compromete a nada.
2.- La sociedad espera que todo lo solucione el gobierno y que la ayuda les caiga del cielo.
3.- La sociedad no se compromete a trabajar para aumentar la productividad y brindar mejores resultados que le beneficien a su economía.
4.- La sociedad no es precavida y se espera hasta que suceda una desgracia para poner orden a sus vidas. No hay programa del gobierno que supere la prevención de los propios ciudadanos.
5.- La recaudación fiscal no es como debería de ser. La ciudadanía no es afecta a pagar los impuestos, pero sí exige que todo en el gobierno funcione como reloj.
Y esto no es privativo de la sociedad Colombiana. Gran parte de las sociedades en los países Latinoamericanos son muy similares en este sentido. La gente llega a ser descuidada, dejada, y no cree ser corresponsable en la prevención del delito, la prevención de accidentes, la prevención de desastres naturales, y más. Todo se lo deja al gobierno y a las autoridades.
Answer:
A. spontaneous recovery
Explanation:
Spontaneous recovery is a term that refers to the reappearance of something (feeling, feeling, among others) that has passed a period of time without appearing, but has appeared before. In Shahid's case, the spontaneous recovery explains why he was again afraid to drive during a snowfall since he had not felt that fear for a long time.
Answer:
Look Below
Explanation:
First Answer, B: Metamorphic
Other answer, I don't know, Sorry
A. represents suspected law breakers in court. District attorneys help prevent people from havign a red mark on their records.
Answer:
There were 2 primary types of government, a democracy, and a hierarchy. A hierarchy had a few different variants, the ruler had all power and was a god, the ruler controlled people, and the ruler had the most power but had a small house of other "government officials"
If I had a kingdom, it would have a democracy as its government. A group of advisors, the house/senate, and what many think is the ultimate power but has equal power, the president/king. Democracy is important. Not too much though, or else you get communism. Now, things were different back then. Most people kept what they had, and the citizens ran their own "government" of sorts. But a democratic government is still needed to control, and maintain the people. When I say control, I don't mean "give me all of your money and earnings and we will give you what you earned in food, water, clothes, and a house." That's communism. What I mean by control, is enforce the rules, make sure that the people don't tear each other apart, limb from limb. The people need guided to the decided way of living, which THEY CHOSE by voting. Therefore, they chose to follow these guidelines, and should not argue. That is how to run a stable government. On paper. Of course, there would be plenty of people who want to cause problems, but those things are too unpredictable to handle without communism. Not saying that it is the only way to run a government, what I meant was those things will be deal with at the time and can't be fixed on a simple word document for a history lesson on a computer learning system meant for a sixth grader to answer in a few sentences, about why you should be good to people, and not meant to go into detail about communism, and meant to see who understands how to live a happy human life, and who knows how to be the next "president" of Russia, and also just to see students creativity and knowledge of world politics as well as their downright opinion. I probably went into a lot of detail but hit the word limit.
Explanation:
hope this helps
