How the electoral college works is that in every state, people vote for a certain candidate. For example, let's say there's Candidate A and Candidate B running for president. If the majority of the state votes for Candidate A, exactly one vote will go towards that candidate. It may seem fair, but it definitely isn't. For another example, let's say that there's State A, State B, and State C. State A has a population of forty million, while State B and State C combined has a population of ten million. State A's majority vote is for Candidate A, but State B and State C's majority vote is Candidate B. Candidate B wins between these three states, since Candidate B has <u>two votes</u> while Candidate A has <u>one vote</u>. So even though State A may have had more votes for Candidate A in <u>numbers,</u> Electoral College allows Candidate B to win, even though the actual numbers are way less than Candidate A's.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
obedience because if you are obedient is good
During Hammurabi's time life was muh different, people were judged for what they did on a eye for an eye basis, which means when someone did something, the same was done back to him. This code was effective in enforcing a stable society at the time.
Answer:
The research must pose no more than minimal risk.
Explanation:
In research, minimal risk refers to the type of risk that only expose the subjects with very little level of discomfort. Typically, this type of risk is required for test subjects who haven't entered adulthood.
Children specifically, still haven't experience perfect development in both of their physiques and brain capacity. This make them became extremely vulnerable for scientific experiments. One single mistake could destroy the rest of their life.
This is why before the researchers even think about asking permission to their parents, they need to ensure that every procedures in the research only pose no more than minimal risk.
Answer:
Classical School of Criminology
Explanation:
The Rational Choice Theory was developed by the Classical School of Criminology. This theory categorized individuals as independent and rational entities that have the liberty to engage in various acts at will. It also explores a utilitarian view of individuals weighing in on the pros and cons and who will <em>rationally</em> choose to behave in a manner that would the most beneficial and/or the least harmful.