Answer:
Case 1 (Fordjour v. Ahmed case on rent) and Case 3 (Giz Construction v. Ministry of Roads on Nonpayment of project ) are civil cases which entail one party by talking the other party to court over money. Ahmed was taken to court by his landlord Fordjour over rent arrears while Minirtsy of Roads was taken to court for non-payment of project by Giz Construction. Case 2 (GRA v. Melcom over Tax payment) is criminal case as it entails Melcom violating laws stipulated by the government.
Answer:
<u>Its the lower house of the United States Congress. The House and the Senate work together on bills to give to the president to put into law.</u>
Explanation:
Answer:
According to me...I won't feel confident when making that decision because that decision will be based on the rules that I must follow and I also believe that when I'm taking a decision is going to be based on what situation you are in.
So decisions are not suppose to be based on rules because everyone have a right to take or make a decision that is suitable for themselves.
When scholars and justices interpret the Constitution with the view that the courts should reject any active lawmaking functions and follow precedent, refers to Judicial Restraint.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The judicial branch is conferred with the power of interpretation of the law. Many times while exercising the power of judicial activism there is always a chance that justices may exceed their power. Hence, the theory of judicial restraint was evolved.
By judicial restraint, judges are encouraged to exercise their power with certain limits and to respect and follow stare decisis. This ensures that judges are not intruding into the realm of the legislature by involving themselves in law making.
Answer:
Dahil ang mgq ilang lalaki ay sinasabing ang lalaki pa rin ang mas may kaya mas malakas at mas may alam kaya ang mga babaebnoon ay limitado ang karapatan;oo merong ilang bansa na ginito pa rin ang kanilang sistema.
