State capture is a political corruption in which private interests significantly influence a state's decision-making processes to their own advantage.
<h3>State capture in South Africa</h3>
State capture is closely related to South African term for what is elsewhere called kleptocracy.
It is the gate in the corruption allegations against the former president. Two sections of the report by the judicial commission investigating allegations of state capture during the regime of the former President Zuma have now been published. This is a similitude of the true definition of state capture.
<h3>Arms of the state</h3>
This refers to the ministries and parastaters of the government.
<h3>Arms of government</h3>
The arms of government refer to the divisions of powers of the government. There are three arms of government involving the Legislature, Executive and the Judiciary.
learn more about arms of government from here:brainly.com/question/9776664
Answer:
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Explanation:
