Answer:
Explanation:
Rakesh followed up on his best therapeutic understanding and confined his patient's eating routine - just this time his patient is his father. One of Desai's objectives is to address where moral limits lie in connection to applying Western logical standards to customary social circumstances: Ought to Rakesh have treated his father, surprisingly, similar to a patient? Would Rakesh have been abusing restorative morals on the off chance that he didn't have any significant bearing exacting standards to his father similarly he did to his different patients?
Two things occured because of Rakesh's limitations on his father's eating regimen. In any event one of these things likewise caused the change that overwhelmed Rakesh's character. One thing is that his rural community raised spouse selfishly and ungenerously enjoyed denying and depriving her father in-law of things he needed. The other is that the father bribed Rakesh's kids to get him the things he needed that Rakesh kept him from having. At the point when Rakesh found the deceit and the misleading, he was maddened, as any parent may be. He not just chided his father in the harshest terms- - something he had never done - he developed the confinements on and expanded the supervision of his eating routine.
The inquiry is raised regarding whether Rakesh's displeasure was supported; regardless of whether it had consistently been a piece of his character however not demonstrated in light of the fact that his father had never prompted it; was on the grounds that he esteemed his father a substandard and ruining impact. The story closes with a greater number of inquiries than it began with. Truth be told, there is an inquiry raised about the way of life that energizes such carefully characterized and communicated jobs that can be so ruinous when turned around or meddled with.
Answer:
The correct answer is B.
Explanation:
From Crusoe's use of the expression "the hand of Heaven had overtaken me", we can deduce that, during Defoe's time, people believed in destiny.
Crusoe believes that his destiny was being fullfilled and that the he could not do much to control his future since it had been already decided by God.
Answer:
The last one (readers must make their own interpretations of the events in the text rather than relying on the author to explain what he means)
Explanation:
Answer:
The magenta and sky blue sentences are the answers.
Magenta) Admittedly, we cannot reuse or recycle all of the materials we use in our daily lives.
and
Sky Blue) My opponent would use these limitations of our ability to recycle to counter my points about the materials we can recycle
Both these sentences are countering the speaker's claim
Answer:
My study looked at how the disgusting Norway rat made people sick. - Investigative writing that shows bias.
The screech owl is a small owl common in North America. - Informative writing.
We wanted to prove whether coyotes are as dangerous as people think. - Investigative writing.
The vile brown recluse spider is named for its sneaky way of life. - Informative writing that shows bias.
Explanation: Good luck! :D
