1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gelneren [198K]
2 years ago
14

Why were some of the framers opposed to the bill of rights

Law
2 answers:
Delicious77 [7]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Because the bill of rights wasn't a rough time it was rather easy then people expect it to be

Explanation:

gavmur [86]2 years ago
3 0
The Federalists opposed including a bill of rights on the ground that it was unnecessary. The Anti-Federalists, who were afraid of a strong centralized government, refused to support the Constitution without one
You might be interested in
Do you watch the news? Do you think the media tells the truth? Why is the news mostly negative?
Strike441 [17]

Answer:

No. Not always, to help us figure out what is most important because if we know the world is a terrible place maybe we would have a new take on life

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If the family’s net monthly income is $7,800, what percent of the income is spent on food, clothing, and housing? 50% 59% 60% 61
harina [27]

Answer:

the monthly percent is 61.

Explanation:

Because with a net monthly income like that yall ballin.

3 0
3 years ago
The Sheriff's Department has information to believe that illegal automatic weapons are being hidden in a garage on Mary Halberst
Allushta [10]

Answer:

a. the evidence presented to the magistrate did not amount to probable cause

Explanation:

Wasnt Enough PC

7 0
2 years ago
How many dogs is too much and how many cats is too much. <br><br> please answer this question
True [87]

Answer:

There is really never too much cats or dogs. It depends on a person's opinion.

Explanation:

If you don't like cats then one cat is to much. Same for dogs. It all depends on the person's opinion.

7 0
2 years ago
The Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Group of answer choices reaffirmed the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson
Simora [160]

Answer:

declared that separate educational facilities were unlawful

Explanation:

The Brown v. Board of Education was established in 1954 and created an opposition to the Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 who affirmed the legality of racial segregation in public places such as buses, schools, squares, hospitals and other places. This opposition was established because at the end of the Brown v. The Board of Education, the Supreme Court ruled that educational institutions that established systems of racial segregation would be acting illegally and that from that moment on they should promote full equal education to all students, regardless of their colors or races.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • michael josephson Its a sign of troubled times when the concept of pressure becomes an acceptable excuse for ethical shortcuts a
    6·1 answer
  • Psychological abuse is associated with more developmental impairments than if the child were physically maltreated
    7·2 answers
  • Under which circumstance is an appeals court most likely to rule that a defendant has been denied the right to assistance of
    9·1 answer
  • 13. The middle layer in the American court system is made up of
    7·1 answer
  • Is popular sovereignty important to a republic? Why or why not?
    6·1 answer
  • What’s a synonym for census
    7·2 answers
  • Who are three members on groups that form the local government​
    12·1 answer
  • Points<br>.............​
    8·1 answer
  • A duty to do or not to do a certain thing
    9·1 answer
  • Franz Joseph Gull suggested that a person's what could predict their criminal tendencies?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!