Answer:
D
Explanation:
because it makes sense trust me I'm sorry if it's wrong
The renowned Greek general Pericles was the one that made the speech that said that If we took to the laws they afford equal justice to all in their private differences.
<h3>What is the meaning of this speech?</h3>
This is the speech that tells us that the law is supposed to have the same opportunities for all persons. That is no one had to be treated in a different manner by the law.
From the speech that this was given was the funeral oration that was given for the soldiers that fell in the Peloponnesian War. The goal of the speech was to persuade the people that were listening to him.
In the speech he had tp praise Athens as a way of helping to encourage them so that they would have to continue fighting in this war.
Read more on Pericles here:
brainly.com/question/894806
#SPJ1
The most likely answer is that the victims should not be able to sue the manufacturer of a violent game for a design effect. This is because it is difficult to establish a direct connection between the video game and the mass shooting. It is likely that thousands, or even millions of other people have played the game constantly and have not developed these tendencies. Moreover, even if the tendencies were developed, this would not mean that the thoughts would develop into action. Thefore, it is unlikely that the manufacturer would be considered liable.
Answer:
maybe
Explanation:
ome observers believe the crisis is due to the lack of economic opportunities, while others argue that it’s a result of foreign meddling and disproportionate military power. The reality, though, is that these are all consequences rather than the cause of Pakistan’s troubles. Taken as a whole, they underscore a deeper crisis within Pakistani society that goes right to the nation’s very foundations—a crisis of identity that originates in the late 19th century, when the idea of an independent Muslim nation in South Asia first emerged.
As Pakistan was founded in truly modern terms—inspired by the principles of self-determination that were prospering during the wave of independence movements in the post-World War II era—the best place to start understanding Pakistan isn’t actually one of these former colonies, but a future colonist: post-revolutionary France.
Not only does Pakistan’s post-independence trajectory bare an uncanny similarity to that of France’s First Republic, but the critiques of its path are similar to those of the French Revolution.
The correct answer should be B. It can better reflect the democratic principle of majority rule.
