Answer: Option(a) is correct option
Explanation:
As per theory of Lepper and colleagues (1973), rewards play a major role in motivation of a student for performing activity as compared to non-rewarding activity.They describes about undermine of performance due to presence of reward in certain time and situation.
According to the question, Joseph will tend to paint in future because he has seen it as the method of earning money as reward rather than making it a passion or enjoying painting.He is interest in money majorly
Other options are incorrect because Joseph becoming an artist in future, still carry out painting passion even if aunt stops rewarding him and money rewarding painting are considered better than no-money rewarding painting are not the outcome of scenario. Thus, the correct option is option(a).
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Based on the Judicial Branch the court case that stands out to me the most is Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas.
For me, this is one of the most important cases in the history of the United States.
The case was decided on May 17, 1954. The Supreme Court decided that state laws in the US public school system that kept racial segregation were unconstitutional.
This was a major advancement in the country regarding the shameful subject of racism. After the US Supreme Court decision, racial segregation in public schools of America ended, at least in theory and by judicial mandate.
Answer: b. Means that there must be compensation for the nuisance-producing party to relocate.
Explanation:
Moving to the nuisance means there must be compensation for the nuisance producing party to relocate. This occurs when the party has stirred up uneasiness amongst members of the society and there have been complains from them concerning the noise level or other things seen which are unbearable for them as a society.
The speaker of the house, the senate majority leader
