Answer
The agreement is contingent agreement and not the unenforceable.
Explanation:
Under a contingent agreement, certain actions are taken resulting from occurring or non-occurring of certain conditions. Here outcomes are dependent upon happening of events.
Answer: a, provides 30 days' notice to futurist of its desire to terminate.
Explanation: for an appointment to be terminated, there would a notice prior that termination, you can't just terminate an appointment without a 30days notice.
Answer:
The debit adjustment to equipment would be $30,000.
Explanation:
Amount received for the equipment by Mortar from Granite - $370,000
Purchase price of the equipment = $400,000
Debit adjustment to equipment = Purchase price of the equipment - Amount received for the equipment by Mortar from Granite = $400,000 - $370,000 = $30,000
Therefore, the debit adjustment to equipment would be $30,000.
Answer:
D) The extra energy benefits Patrick gets from another can are no longer worth the cost. MB/MC (S)
Explanation:
The optimal quantity for Patrick to consume is 5 cans of GreenCow.
This is the quantity where MARGINAL BENEFIT EQUALS MARGINAL COST. For all quantities up to the 5th, the marginal benefit is higher than the marginal cost. This means that Patrick's net benefit is increasing, and consuming all units up to this point make him better off.
If Patrick were to consume any more than 5 cans of GreenCow, the cost of each additional can would be higher than the additional benefit (because the marginal cost curve is higher than the marginal benefit curve). Consuming any cans beyond the 5th, therefore, makes him worse off.
