Answer:
The increase in reserve will ultimately lead to an increase in the money supplied.
Explanation:
From the scenario under study, the bank is greeted with uncertain economic realities. To cope with this, the bank resolves that rather than lend out excess reserves, it should rather increase the percentage of deposits held as reserve from 10% to 25%. Thus, this leads to a multiplier effect. And the reserve ratio from the forgoing is 1 to 4. That is, 1/10 to 1/4. Meaning there's a reduction in multiplier effecf of 10 to 4. And looking critically, this is a reciprocal of the new reserve ratio of 1/4
When bank hold more reserve, the ripple effect is that the Fed would buy more bonds. To increase the money supply by $200, however, the Fed will need to get a bond of $50.
The implication of this is that the bank reserve will rise in same amount. But taking the multiplier effect into cognizance, a small multiplier will be occasioned in form:
$50 * 4= $200.
Effectively, we have increased the money supply by $200, owing to the multiplier effect.
<span>anonymous 2 years ago</span><span>A company launched four new products. The market price, in dollars, of the four products after different number of years is shown below:
The price of which product will eventually exceed all others?</span>
Answer:
I think ot is fruit punch
