Answer:
Andrew Jackson (AJ for short) was a statesman. He reached the height of this career when he became the 7th President of the United States (POTUS, having served as a soldier and a general in the United States Army). His administration spanned two terms of 4 years each (1829 to 1837)
In direct reference to the question, it can be said that due to his action, he was rather tyrannical than monarchial.
Explanation
On the overall, AJ is regarded by may historians favorably due to his many big wins. Some of those wins which he achieved as POTUS are:
- The payment of a long standing national debt
- the conclusion of the "most favored nation" treaty with the United Kingdom, which settled claims of damages against France from the Napoleonic Wars,
- Prevention of the renewal of the charter of the Second Bank of the United States which was deemed as corrupt established created to enrich the wealthy at the expense of the plebian class and
- the recognition Texas as a Republic. It may be worthy of note that he was the first POTUS to have survived an assassination attempt as a sitting president.
Irrespective of the above, his career was marred by two major dents:
- The endorsement of the of the 1830 Indian Removal Act which forced many Native American tribes in the South to a space that became known as the Indian Territory. The forceful relocation was deemed necessary by the Blue Bloods (White Population) and resulted in mass suffering, mass death by many who where diseased during the forced relocation.
- The Nullification Crises: For some reason, the congress approved a bill which by itself was designed to fail or be disapproved. It placed a huge tariff (as much as 45%, a historic high) on the Southern Cotton Farmers. The bill became known as the "Tariff of Abominations". He later conceded to several downward revisions of the tariff, first to 27% and further downwards later but not after it had caused a lot of rift between the state of South Carolina and the Federal Government where in the South Carolina had declared the bill unconstitutional. This call out against the Federal Government became known as the Nullification Crises.
Cheers
Answer:
i don't thing i understand the question.
Explanation:
Im guessing the 3rd or the first Idunno
It is possible to question Jane Eyre’s
proto-feminism on the grounds that Jane only becomes Rochester’s
full equal (as she claims to be in the novel’s epilogue-like last
chapter) when he is physically infirm and dependent on her to guide
him and read to him—in other words, when he is physically incapable
of mastering her. However, it is also possible that Jane now finds
herself Rochester’s equal not because of the decline Rochester has
suffered but because of the autonomy that she has achieved by coming
to know herself more fully.<span />
Answer:
13.17%
Explanation:
Given that;
Net income = $30,955
Asset at the beginning of the year = $212,000
Asset at the end of the year = $258,000
Return on assets = Net income / Average total assets
But,
Average total assets = (Assets at the beginning of the year + Assets at the end of the year ) / 2
Average total assets = ($212,000 + $258,000) / 2
Average total assets = $235,000
Therefore,
Return on assets = ($30,955 / $235,000) × 100
Return on assets = 13.17%
