Answer:
Connell tells his story in an understated fashion, most often allowing the events to speak for themselves. He does, however, at times interject his own opinions, and he makes it clear that his is a modernist perspective: The battle is finally more absurd than heroic, more pitiful than romantic.
Explanation: oof- someone said this already
<span>Cats are lovable and—hey, stop eating my plant, you bad cat!
This is because the speaker is being cut off, which in this case is what the dash should be placed, the speaker is obviously being knocked off course from their sentence, stopping abruptly.</span>
to me N° 4 should be right
hope I helped !
Answer:
It's is a first-person point of view.
Explanation:
Identifying the first-person point of view is quite easy, especially if compared to identifying the many types of third-person ones. A narrative done from a first-person perspective will used first-person pronouns ("I" and "we"), since the narrator also takes part in the story. In third-person narratives, first-person pronouns can be used in lines said by the characters, but not by the narrator. It's worth mentioning that first-person narrators cannot be fully trusted. Their story will be permeated by their own feelings and biases.
As we can see in the passage we are studying here, the perspective is a first-person one. Notice the use of the pronoun "we":
There was no possibility of taking a walk that day. We had been wandering, indeed, in the leafless shrubbery an hour in the morning...
Answer:
so, since, now, almost, hourly
Explanation:
