Answer:
Inductive
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning creates wide conclusions from certain observations, just as in this case study, the rate of murder. Majorly, there is data (in our case study- This pattern holds true, even when she controls for population differences (so it is not due to more people living in northern cities)), then generalizations are made from the data (from our case study--greater "culture of violence" in the south produces higher murder rates). This is often referred to as inductive logic, according to Utah State University.
"In inductive inference, there is a shift from an actual one to general form. We make many notations, create a pattern, make a conclusion, and create an explanation or a theory," Wassertheil-Smoller told Live Science. "In science, there is a constant interconnection among inductive inference (based on notations) and deductive inference (based on theory), until we arrive in proximity to the 'truth,' by not just approaching but to be able to prove with total certainty."
Another instance of inductive logic is, "when a person pulls out a coin from a bag and it happened to be a penny. On reaching out the second time, the person also picked a penny, and at the third time, a third coin from the bag is also a penny. It will bring the person to make a generalization that all the coins in the bag are pennies."
Even if the entire premises are correct in a statement, inductive reasoning permits for the generalization to be false. Another example "Semai is a grandmother. Semai is bald. Therefore, all grandmothers are bald." The generalization does not comply logically from the statements.
Answer:
National Hero
Explanation:
According to historical records and background, in the 1828 presidential election, Andrew Jackson's big margin of victory was due to his popularity and his ability to be seen as a "NATIONAL HERO."
Andrew Jackson was generally seen as a national hero due to his significant role in defeating the British at the Battle of New Orleans in 1815 during the British war of 1812 or the Forgotten War which lasted between 1812 to 1815.
If your choices are checks and balances, federalism, executive power, and common law, then the correct answer is federalism.
Checks and balances has to do with limiting the powers of each branch of the government. Executive power is there to bring new laws. Common law is not written. Federalism refers to the general and regional governments working together on implementing new laws all over the state.
Answer:
When Mendel crossed the plants he concluded that pea traits like flower color were determined by separate units. From the results, Mendel proved that all traits do not blend. For instance, purple flowers mixed with white flowers did not produce pink flowers. Mendel concluded that traits like flower color must be determined by individual units.
Explanation:
Answer:
does not yet understand conservation
Explanation:
The concept of conservation was proposed by psychologist Jean Piaget and the concept emphasizes that an infant recognizes that altering the shape of a material or object does not alter its number, total volume or mass. His hypothesis indicates that this capacity is not present in children between the ages of 2 and 7 but comes later at the concrete operational stage between the ages of 7 and 11. As per the question, Colin does not understand that pieces of sandwich would not decrease its size and it reflects that he lacks the understanding of conservation.
