That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
I would say to, protect people because the people in the society can’t call military forces or something like that to protect themselves but the government can.
Sorry if I’m wrong.
Answer:
B. ideas of reference.
Explanation:
The idea of reference: The idea of reference is also referred to as delusion of reference. An idea of reference reflects an individual's false belief about any irrelevant details or occurrences in the world and relate it directly to one's personality and self.
In other words, when an individual believes that his or her actions, presence, or thoughts are the reason behind something that occurs in time, then ideas of reference occurs.
In the question above, the statement signifies the ideas of reference.
