Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Suppose :
62% own an HDTV
16% own a computer
Using the addition rule : suggests that (62% + 16%) = 78% either own an HDTV or a computer.
The reasoning is wrong because ; since it is possible to own both an HDTV and also own a computer at the same time, the outcome of the addition rule is wrong as both events are independent. If both event cannot occur at the same time (mutually exclusive event) , then, the addition rule may be applied,. But since both can occur independently and each family can own an HDTV while also owning a computer, then the addition rule is wrong for the scenario described.
SOLUTION;
![\sqrt[]{-36}\text{ = }\sqrt[]{(36)(-1)}\text{ = }\sqrt[]{36}\text{ x }\sqrt[]{-1\text{ }}\text{ = 6i}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B-36%7D%5Ctext%7B%20%3D%20%7D%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B%2836%29%28-1%29%7D%5Ctext%7B%20%3D%20%7D%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B36%7D%5Ctext%7B%20x%20%7D%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B-1%5Ctext%7B%20%7D%7D%5Ctext%7B%20%3D%206i%7D)
Recall that the square root of the negative one is "i" meaning that it is a complex number and not a real number.
It factorises to -
4(x+6)
Ones place i think would be the awser
Answer:
ok
Step-by-step explanation:
