Answer:
when valuing companies with temporarily high growth rates.
Explanation:
Discounted dividend models are methods to assess a company's share price based on the dividends that company will distribute in the future. Also known by its name in English dividend discount model (DDM).
These models are based on the theory that the price of a share must be equal to the price of the dividends that the company will deliver, discounted at its net present value.
If the price of the share in the market is lower than the result obtained by the discounted dividend model, the share is undervalued and therefore it is advisable to buy. If, on the contrary, the market price is higher than the model, it is understood that the share price is too high.
Multistage dividend growth models
It is very difficult for a company to experience the same growth every year as the Gordon model assumes, so multistage models assume different growths for each period.
The most common is to use two or three stage growths, where at first the growths are higher but then tend to stabilize at a smaller constant growth. As for example in early stage companies.
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Answer:
D. Use an indirect approach to soften the blow.
Explanation:
Even though there really is no perfect method or strategy when rejecting a job application, many companies usually agree on using an indirect approach to soften the blow. This saves the receiver of the rejection from the pain that they may otherwise feel from a direct rejection, since a direct approach will make them feel as though the rejection is completely their fault.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
a) $337,615.38
b-1) $360,910.85
b-2) $415,266.92
c-1) $362,637.36
c-2) $438,461.54
Explanation:
a) To find the current value of the company, we have:
= 
= $337,615.38
b-1) If the company takes on debt equal to 30 percent of its unlevered value.
337,615.38 + (0.23 * 337,615.38 * 0.30)
= $360,910.85
b-2) When the company can borrow at 10 percent. The value of the firm if the company takes on debt equal to 100 percent of its unlevered value will be:
337,615.38 + (0.23 * 337,615.38 * 1)
= $415,266.92
c-1) The value of the firm if the company takes on debt equal to 30 percent of its levered value:
= $362,637.36
c-2) The value of the firm if the company takes on debt equal to 100 percent of its levered value:
= $438,461.54
