Answer:
The annual difference between Option 1 (15 years) and Option 2 (20 years) is $7,211.19 in favor of the first one.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Option 1:
Number of years= 15
FV= 450,000
i= 0.0525
Option 2:
Number of years= 20
FV= 450,000
i= 0.0525
To calculate the annual cash flow, we will use the following formula on each option:
A= (FV*i)/{[(1+i)^n]-1}
A= annual cash flow
<u>Option 1:</u>
A= (450,000*0.0525) / [(1.0525^15) - 1]
A= $20,464.72
<u>Option 2:</u>
A= (450,000*0.0525) / [(1.0525^20) - 1]
A= $13,253.53
The annual difference between Option 1 (15 years) and Option 2 (20 years) is $7,211.19 in favor of the first one.
Answer:
d) overapplied $160
Explanation:
$35,000 expected overhead / 5,000 machine= 7 dollar per machine hour are spend on overhead
<em><u>applied overhead:</u></em>
4,980 x 7 = 34,860
<u><em>actual overehad:</em></u> 34,700
As the amount of cost enter by the accounting are above the real cost, we are going to increase the manufacturing overhead cost and making the net income lower for this particular reason.
Answer:
(B) Increase both assets and equity by $180
Explanation:
The transaction analysis model tells us that:
Assets = Liabilities + Owner's Equity
Owner's equity = Contributed Capital + Retained Earnings
Retained Earnings = Net Income − Dividends
and
Net Income = Income − Expenses
The expanded accounting equation is obtain if all substitutions are made:
Asset = Liabilities + Contributed Capital + Income – Expenses − Dividends
In the Global Cleaning Service`s case:
Assets are increased either because the service is collected or is an account receivable. As the service provided is a revenue (income) is part of the Owner's Equity that also increase. Both, Asset and Owner's Equity, increase in 180.
Answer: B) Correct Incorrect
Explanation:
Whilst it was generally believed at some point that raising taxes and Government Spending by the same amount would have no effect, research has disproven this thought.
This is because it was shown that an increase in Government Spending leads to a larger increase in GDP than an increase in taxes reduces it.
This is because when the Government spends money, the Multiplier effect of Government Spending is always 1 more than that of the Taxes therefore raising taxes and spending by the same amounts still increases the Real GDP because Government Spending will create more income than taxes will take.
Necco is right, Packard is wrong.
