What are the 4 questions to ask when you analyze a transaction into Debits & Credits

A stigmatized property is one: (a) Where physical damage makes it undesirable to buyers (b) That a historical society owns and m

katrin [286]

Answer:

(C) Where a particular event has affected the desirability of the property

Explanation:

A stigmatized property is one that has been psychologically impacted by an event that occurred on the property or one that has been suspected to have occurred on that property. Such a property is now "stigmatized" because such an event will have a drastic effect on multiple values and aspects of the property.

4 0

3 years ago

why is government intervention often crucial when dealing with both positive and negative externalities?

Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer:

Because the government can use her sovereign power to both mitigate negative externalities as well as encourage positive externalities.

Explanation:

A positive externality occurs when the transaction between a producer and end user benefits a third party that did not take art in the process.

A very Good example is Education. There is a third party benefit to the society when we have more educated citizens.

A negative externality happens when the business transaction between a manufacturer and consumer affects a third party adversely. a typical example is cigarettes. When cigarettes is consumed by the end user, the smoke can affect the health of a third party that was not part of the initial transaction.

To deal with both positive and negative externalities, government intervention is very crucial.

Government encourages positive externalities like education by subsidizing the cost of attending a school. They also enact laws that make basic education compulsory.

In the case of negative externalities, Government can intervene with a ban on producing harmful goods and also set a legislation about smoking in public laces to mitigate the health complications caused by third party inhalation.

6 0

3 years ago

he St. Augustine Corporation originally budgeted for $360,000 of fixed overhead at 100% normal production capacity. Production w

OLga [1]

Answer:

$9000 (unfavorable).

Explanation:

Given: Budgeted fixed overhead= $360000.

Actual fixed overhead=$ 360000.

Actual production= 11,700 units.

The variable overhead rate was $3 per hour.

The standard hours for production were 5 hours per unit.

The fixed factory overhead volume variance is difference between actual production volume and budgeted production. It help in measuring the effecient use of fixed resources. It is termed as favourable if actual fixed overhead exceed the budgeted amount, however, it is unfavorable if the actual fixed overhead is less than budgeted amount.

Now, lets calculate the Actual fixed overhead cost.

Actual fixed overhead cost= $\textrm{actual fixed overhead}\times \frac{Actual\ production}{Budgeted\ production}$

∴ Actual fixed overhead cost= $\$ 360000\times \frac{11700}{12000} = \$ 351000.$

Actual fixed overhead cost= $351000.

Next calculating the fixed factory overhead volume variance.

The fixed factory overhead volume variance= $\textrm{Actual fixed overhead cost}-\textrm{budgeted fixed overhead}$

We know, Budgeted fixed overhead= $360000 and Actual fixed overhead cost= $351000

∴ The fixed factory overhead volume variance= $\$351000-\$360000= \$ 9000 (unfavorable)$

The fixed factory overhead volume variance= $9000 (unfavorable)

6 0

4 years ago

Carlita began 2014 with a taxes payable account balance of $3,000. On December 31, 2014, its taxes payable account balance is $7

aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Answer:

$2,000

Explanation:

The computation of the amount pay to the tax authorities during the year is shown below;

Let us assume the accrued payment be $6,000

Let us assume the amount pay to the tax authorities be X

Beginning Taxes payable account balance + Accrued payment - X = Ending taxes payable account balance

$3,000 + $6,000 - X = $7,000

$9,000 - X = $7,000

So, the X is

= $9,000 - $7,000

= $2,000

hence, the amount pay to the tax authorities is $2,000

4 0

3 years ago

The FDIC found out that a company misreported information to a credit scoring company about Wanda. Wanda contacted the company a

Alborosie

Fair Credit Reporting Act

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers