Copying someone work, not citing sources
Simple multiplication:
And
So do you now see how they are the same? :)
The first answer is A im not true about the another one I belive factual(A).
I hope this helps yu:)
Answer: This argument has Some merits but it also has some logical errors that undermines its reasoning and conclusion.
Explanation:
(1) IT FAILED TO GIVE THE TOTAL POPULATION OF WORKERS FROM WHERE THE SAMPLE(1200 PEOPLE) WERE DERIVED AND WHAT SAMPLING METHOD WAS USED: This is a logical error, sampling has to be in RELATION TO THE POPULATION.The sampling method should have been defined.Samples may have been taken from a given A CLASS OF WORKERS.
(2) IT SHOULD HAVE GIVEN CLEARER AND OTHER CHOICES RELATED TO MANAGEMENT ISSUES: It should have made more choices of questions about management issues so that a BROAD, ELABORATE, REASONABLE,ACCURATE AND CONVINCING conclusion will be arrived at.
Answer:
pls mark me brainliest pls
<h3>
<em>☆ Explanation</em></h3>
Read the excerpt: “Teenage caffeine consumption, once limited to sodas and hot chocolate, now has nearly become the norm in the Bay Area and nationally. Though no statistics exist to chart teenage coffee drinkers—the National Coffee Association polls only consumers 18 and older—a drive past any coffeehouse near a high school would show that it’s replaced the iconic malt shop of the’ 50s or 7-Eleven of the 70s as a place to socialize.”
What is the central idea of the above excerpt?
Teens no longer hang out at malt shops or 7 Elevens to socialize.
Teens are drinking more caffeine now than during the 50s to the 70s.
Teens don’t realize the amount of hidden caffeine they are consuming.
Teens today are becoming more addicted to coffee both nationally and in the Bay area.
