Answer: Yes, I agree with Graeter’s decision to stop franchising?.
Explanation:
Graeter’s decision to stop franchising was simply to maintain the quality of their products.
If I was in his position, I'll also like to maintain our products quality. It is vital to keep the family business while also following the laid down principles by those before me. Hence, I agree with his decision.
Yes, Bob does retain interest in this transaction as he registered under safeguard terms. because the protection clause suggest:-
A former agent is additionally obligated to the buyer registered under the protection provision in the listing agreement if the seller is shown the property by an agent within the listing term as the listing expires. The seller will still be required to pay the agent's fee if a protected buyer tries to make a direct purchase from them while the protection period is still in effect.
<h3><u>What is the purpose of a protection clause?</u></h3>
- A safety protection provision is intended to guarantee that a broker gets paid fairly for their services and to prohibit buyers' and sellers' collusion.
- A contingency known as a broker protection clause, sometimes known as a safety clause or extension clause, is present in listing agent contracts. This provision states that in some circumstances, even if the house sells after their listing has expired, the seller will pay the listing agent commission fees.
To know more about protection clause, check the given links.
brainly.com/question/25079139
brainly.com/question/2252772
#SPJ4
This answer is FALSE - FUN FACT - Liquidity of money refers to the ease with which the owner of an asset can convert it into cash it is easier to convert common stocks into cash rather than attempt to raise cash from sale or mortgage of real estate assets
If the consumer expected price increase for any reason in such good he will buy it before the time he expects to apply for that increase.
Answer:
none of the choices are correct
Explanation:
When the discount rate assigned for an individual project then it should be based on the risk i.e attached to the fund use needed by the project
There were various cases when a risky firm invested in a less risky project also if the same cost of capital is used so the firm could alter the decision of an investment in a negative manner
Therefore none of the choices are correct
