Answer:
SAME MY FREAKIN TEACHER IS MAKING ME ANSWER A BUNCH OF QUESTIONS FROM THE STUPID BOOK AS IF WE DONT ALREADY HAVE ENOUGH GOING ON IN OUR LIVES BECAUSE OF THE DUMB VIRUS
Explanation:
Answer:
The statement that best summarizes the difference between these two ads is They have different appeals.
Explanation:
The ad from 1971 that was widely known as "The Crying Indian" was part of a campaign that has the purpose of making people aware of pollution and that they can do something to fix it, the appeal was emotional, while the campaign that they launched in 2013 add something more to it, they added a proposal so now besides being emotional it also has a sense of logic in it.
Answer:
The American entry into World War I was also simpler than the American entry ... But the neutral USA entered World War II only after many months of argument in ... in a bloody war for the sake of distant China, or in what some Americans saw as ... the Japanese raid that brought the United States into the Second World War
Explanation:
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
This can turn out well, but in most cases, when one gives someone a second chance, they never stop giving them out.
For example, Stacey wanted to go to prom with Tom and he agreed. However, he stood her up the whole night and went out with friends instead. She was hurt and tried to cut him off but he begged to let him stay and promised he'd be better, so Stacey gave him a second chance.
They end up dating but Stacey finds herself getting stood up for dates and such all the time for him to hang out with friends, but she keeps giving second chances.
The second scenario goes as follows: Stacey wanted to go to prom with Tom and he agreed. However, he stood her up the whole night and went out with friends instead. She was hurt and tried to cut him off but he begged to let him stay and promised he'd be better, so Stacey gave him a second chance.
The second time he was better. They dated and he was loyal, and things ended well.
It depends on how manipulative the person is.