If the earth’s tilt on its axis were to increase by 20 degrees, the tropic of Capricorn will be at 23.4° + 20°= 43.4°
If the inclination of the axis of the Earth were to rise, the following changes would occur: In various parts of the planet, both the length of the days and the length of the nights would lengthen or shorten, respectively. The duration of each season as well as its average temperature would be altered. There would be different temperatures in different parts of the planet.
The present angle of the Earth's axis of rotation is 23.5 degrees. Earth's seasons are the result of the planet's axis being tilted. The amount of direct sunlight reaching various latitudes and longitudes on Earth varies throughout the year. When the North Pole is in its most equatorial position, it experiences summer, whereas the South Pole is at its most southern position and so experiences winter. When the South Pole is leaning toward the sun, the situation is reversed.
Some people wrongly believe that summer is when Earth is closest to the Sun, but that is not the case. However, in winter the Northern Hemisphere is physically closer to the Sun than it is in summer. Because of how far away Earth is from the Sun, the planet experiences very small temperature swings when the Sun moves closer or further away.
The Earth's axis of rotation is skewed because of a collision with a massive extraterrestrial object named Theia. The impact jarred the axis out of whack and set in motion the release of material that eventually coalesced as the moon of Earth. Various portions of Earth get direct sunlight at different times because of the tilt's consistent orientation with respect to the Sun.
Learn more about Earth's axis here-brainly.com/question/26221772
Overgrazing, which is when farmers allow livestock to graze to the point where they damage the vegetation, and deforestation, which is the process of removing trees and transforming a forest into cleared land, are also ways that humans cause desertification by removing vegetation.
features such as mountains (higher elevation = colder temperatures), ocean (winds blowing to land), valleys (could create a rain shadow, making it very rainy), etc.
Answer:
here you go :)
Explanation:
Korean and Japanese share a similar system of proximal and distal demonstrative pronouns. They are both topic-prominent, null-subject languages. Both languages extensively utilize turning nouns into verbs via the "to do" helper verbs. They both lack a compulsory distinction of plurality. Korean and the Japonic languages are among the few extant languages in the world with topic markers.
The topic of similarity between the two languages can be politically controversial due to the historical relationship between Japan and Korea, particularly the language policy of Japanese-ruled Korea. Recent population genetic studies reveal that modern Koreans and Japan share as much as a 90 percent overlap in ancestry. The relationship between the languages remains controversial. The Transeurasian hypothesis by Robbeets et al, supported by computational linguistics and archeological evidence, suggests a genealogical link between the Korean and Japanese populations. Korean, Japanese, and Chinese characters are used in Japanese orthography, with the exception of North Korea, where they are used for limited academic, legal, media, stylistic and disambiguation purposes in South Korea today, while eliminated in North Korea.
Japanese and Korean have different native scripts, although a common denominator is the presence of Chinese characters. Japanese doesn't have separate verb forms for attributive verbs, just a predicative verb before a noun. Korean uses distinct conjugations for making attributive verb forms in three tenses. Japanese uses the non-past (present) tense for future events, whereas Korean uses the past tense. The Japanese perfective has two meanings when the stem is an intransitive verb, and it depends on the context.
Some linguists argue that Korean has two tenses (past, present) or four (greater past, past, present, future), and some even argue that Korea has no tense at all but only aspects. The three tense theory is generally accepted but still remains controversial. Japanese has distinct attributiveverb forms for nouns and verbs, but Korean has distinct verb forms to make attributive nouns for verbs. Korean has separate particles for the present perfect and present progressive so their meanings are morphologically different. Japanese's perfective can have two meanings, depending on context; present perfect (e.g. 牾) or the present progressive ( e.g., 走guarded)
