I think you should double check it and see if you can find the answer if not come back and ask again
This means that the Europeans had imperialism but not colonialism over the African countries.
The fact that the Europeans left the native regimes in the African territories in which they expanded, means that they did not colonized the countries, but instead let the locals to function in a manner similar to what they had until than. Also, that means that they did not brought lot of settlers with them in order to change the demographics of the regions, as that was not their intent.
The Europeans though had strong impact on the societies, be it in the usage of their languages, the cultural elements, the technology, which mean that the Europeans were the imperial overlords that gradually were implementing things into the African societies, and controlled the strings, but usually from their motherlands.
<span>Answer: demonstrated that the slaves were as aware of the idea of liberty as anyone else.
The
large population of Virginia slaves, before the rebellion of Gabriel
Prosser, as it has been called, was increasing, while Gabriel and his
brothers had learned to read, and it is quite possible that they were
blacksmiths, as well as his father. They were owned by
Thomas Prosser, and in August 1800 attempted a rebellion, which failed
because of rain, and because they were denounced by two slaves. Gabriel,
who was literate, and considered of intelligence and superior rank,
even by whites, was hanged next to the 23 slaves who tried to rebel. <span>By
this attempt of rebellion, free African-Americans, and slaves, were
prohibited from reading and writing, to prevent further rebellions.
</span></span>
Washington negotiated a treaty with the Natives which paid for their land and resettlement in federally protected areas.