Answer:
No adjustment in records can be made until the asset is sold.
Explanation:
This is an example of cost concept. Assets are generally recorded at cost and remain on the accounting records at cost until they are disposed of. Future economic condition may change this appraised value, and therefore no adjustment in records can be made until the asset is sold.
*A limited partner's signature on the subscription agreement grants the general partner power of attorney to conduct the partnership's affairs. The subscription agreement for a limited partnership is deemed accepted when the general partner signs the subscription agreement.
<h3>What is a subscription agreement for a limited partnership?</h3>
The subscription agreement, when executed by a limited partner, gives the general partner the authority to manage the business of the partnership. When the general partner signs the subscription agreement, it is considered approved for a limited partnership.
<h3>What does the general partner's signature on the subscription agreement mean?</h3>
The limited partners are given authority to manage the partnership's affairs by the general partner's signature. The subscription agreement, when executed by a limited partner, gives the general partner the authority to manage the business of the partnership.
<h3>What is a recourse note in a limited partnership?</h3>
Recourse notes obligate the limited partner to make payments regardless of what transpires. He is legally responsible for the $40,000, making his tax base and possible maximum loss $50,000.
A) manage partnership assets on behalf of the partnership as an agent. B) offer the limited partnership real estate.
Learn more about Limited partnership:
brainly.com/question/25877213
#SPJ4
Hello,
Question - The U.S. Supreme Court case United States v. Bagley compels the prosecution to disclose any evidence that the _________ requests.
Answer - "evidence that the defense requests"
Why - "Bagley claimed that the government had violated his due process rights by withholding evidence that the defense could have utilized to impeach the witnesses. The district court held that the evidence was not material because the outcome would have been the same. "
Answer:
Hey mate....
subscribed already.....thx for points
