Answer:
C. Real GDP would be higher but the price level would be the same
Explanation:
Real gdp would get to be higher as long run aggregate supply goes up. Prices would go down because as long run aggregate supply goes up, aggregate demand does not experience the same proportional increase. As long run aggregate supply goes up, short run aggregate supply falls backwards.
Answer:
The individual will plan to spend or consume more of his wages than usual; since he believes there'll be a tax cut.
Explanation:
C = consumption
W = wages
Note: No graph is attached to the question so we can't make use of certain information in the question.
Suppose there is an announced change in tax policy - a tax cut/reduction - and a tax increase later; <em>what is the impact of this policy on consumption if the consumer believes that the policy will be implemented?</em>
<em />
Reasoning as an economist, the first reaction of a rational consumer is to begin to consume more since he believes the tax reduction policy will be implemented.
NOTE that sometimes the government or financial ministry in a country intentionally announce policies just so citizens can begin adjusting their consumption and investment patterns in line with them. They do not necessarily follow up with implementation of the policies.
So for a consumer who believes that there'll be a tax cut, he'll be excited and will either consume more of his present wage or consume all and borrow or dissave.
Answer:
Situation 1 is a probably contingency. This recall is occurring and can be estimated as costing $2 million. This amount should be charge to the warranties payable and warranties expense accounts.
Date
Particulars
Ref.no
Debit $
Credit $
Warrantee expenses
20,00,000
Warranty payable account
20,00,000
[To record the estimated claims]
Comment
Step 3 of 3
Situation 2 is a reasonable contingency. The costs are possible and there are rough estimates for cleanup but there are also rough estimates about reimbursements for property damage. This situation would be disclosed on the balance sheet.
Situation 3 is a remote contingency. There is a small change that there could be property damage but there is no way to determine how much or what the costs could be. There is no amount marked down for this situation
Explanation:
How does a subsidy affect supply?
A subsidy by nature increases the purchasing power of the individual or class it is awarded to. It's like free money that can only be spent on certain things.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The Desses would have had a stronger argument if the contract was silent in this way because it would have been less likely that there was a designated class of third-party beneficiaries under the contract.
Cheers
