Answer:
false
Step-by-step explanation:
(-7-2) > (6-14)
-7-2 = -9
6-14 = -8
-9 is not > -8, because -9 is farther to the left on a number line. So, this statement would be false.
Standard form is just putting (in this case) variables in alphabetical order. First we simplify- 2x+4=4y would become 1/2x+1=y. This is already in standard form, as numbers w/o variables come at the end. simplifying the next one is more tricky. first you get a variable/number alone-
9-2x-2y=4x+3
9-2y=6x+3
6-2y=6x
1-1/3y=x
1=x+1/3y
3=x+y
x+y=3
sorry if I was wrong and not of any help, But I do believe this is correct.
Answer:
Step by step explanation:
Answer:
15x+20
Step-by-step explanation:
you multiply 3x×5 and you get 15 and then you multiply 5×4 and you get 20
Answer:
Option A is right
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that approximately 52% of all recent births were boys. In a simple random sample of 100 recent births, 49 were boys and 51 were girls. The most likely explanation for the difference between the observed results and the expected results in this case is
A) variability due to sampling
-- True because there is a slight difference whichmay be due to sampling fluctuations.
B) bias
False because given that 100 random births selected
C) nonsampling error
False. There is no chance for systematic error here.
d) Confounding: There is no confounding variable present inchild birth since each is independent of the other
e) a sampling frame that is incomplete
False because the sampling is done correctly.
