Answer:
Modern hunter-gatherers live in a few isolated areas of the world where developing a civilization is hard: either because of climatic conditions, because of the geography or both. Among these regions we have: The Amazon Rainforest, where there are hundreds of small hunter-gatherer groups, some of them still uncontacted, some areas of Central Africa like the rainforests of Congo, and the Kalahari Desert, and some areas in Siberia. The Island of Papua New Guinea also hosts a few hunter-gatherer groups.
These groups share many similarities with early hunter-gatherers: they form small bands because the amount of food they collect or hunt does not support very high populations, there social structures are not as hierarchical, with income and wealth inequality being almost non-existent, and they engage in trade with other groups for those goods that they cannot produce or collect on their own. The biggest difference is that many of these hunter-gatherers keep contact with other civilizations. For example, a few groups of the Amazon Rainforest trade with Brazilian or Peruvian farmers.
Answer: false
Explanation: He chose it because it was a pretty place not being careful.
Answer:
The people who live within that politician’s area would let him know what is going on regarding policy issues that would affect them because the results of the problem might effect them in very hard or permanent ways. Sense we live in time with a government that is "by the people" it is their choice and opinion that most things are based on.
Explanation:
let me know if this helps any
The answer would be Gauls
<span>In 1777, George Washington started admitting American blacks into the Continental Army. The reason he did this was to prevent the American blacks from joining the opposing British army. He felt allowing blacks into the military would limit that possibility.</span>
