Answer:
The correct option is the statement that reads " If a firm commits to making its environment a good place to work,workers will not leave"
Explanation:
The most qualified employees are always been poached because of the value they add to any organization,hence the first statement is absolute truth.
The second statement is wrong because there the best working environment cannot stop people from resigning,what in case someone needs to study masters abroad?
A certain level of turnover is healthy since it paves from for new hands with fresh perspective to be hired.
However, when turnovers becomes excessive,it implies a fundamental problem with the workplace.
Based on the record of employee complaints, it is correct to say that the HydroHealth company is exhibiting the market culture.
<h3 /><h3>What is market culture?</h3>
It corresponds to an organizational culture based on competitiveness in the internal and external environment, that is, competitiveness is also encouraged among employees, being a more aggressive model of culture.
Therefore, the market culture can generate some disadvantages, such as increased employee turnover and task overload, increasing conflicts and negatively impacting the perception of work.
Find out more about organizational culture here:
brainly.com/question/26965722
Answer:
Explanation:
the difference between a successful and an unsuccessful decision is with a successful decision you would be successful and make profit since this is the subject of business and an unsuccessful decision will make you lose profit and make you lose into Investments. there is no luck vs skill this is all skill actually. skill has to do with this because you need to have certain experience in a certain thing to be having a successful decision.
Answer:
sunk cost.
Explanation:
Sunk cost can be defined as a cost or an amount of money that has been spent on something in the past and as such cannot be recovered. Thus, because a sunk cost has been incurred by an individual or organization it can't be recovered and as such it is irrelevant in the decision-making process such as investments, projects etc.
Basically, sunk costs are referred to as fixed costs.
Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
Hence, a cost incurred in the past that is not relevant to any current decision is classified as a sunk cost.
For example, ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.
I'm not sure I believe its mark up or supply and demand
