Answer:d. foot-in-the-door
Explanation:
Compliance is changed of behavior based on someone request; a person does something because someone else has asked them to but it is not that easy so persuasion techniques are useful in this case.
The foot in the door technique is based on presumption that if you can get someone to do a small request if would be easier for you to make your way towards asking them to do a second request which is larger than the first one. When a person has already agreed to a small favour they may face difficulties resisting to say yes to a bigger one.
Let us make an example when your friend did not attend one of the morning class and they request that you borrow them your notes. It is a reasonable request that you won't really even see a need or reason to say no. After a while the friend who borrowed your morning class notes comes back again now requesting that you borrow them all of that subject notes chances are you will find it hard to refuse now after you had previously given them those morning class notes that they had missed that other day.
Another example is when your mom's friend or your sister ask you to baby sit for them for jsut an hour whilst they go to the shop and they will be back soon.
Few weeks late they ask if you can baby sit for them a whole day and they will be back in the evening chances Re it may be hard to refuse after you have agreed to that one hour baby sitting time.
<em>Ans</em><em>:</em><em>-</em>
Explanation:
- limited, because not everyone serves in parliament
- limited, because citizens have a say over who serves in government***
- unlimited, because citizens do not pick the prime minister
- unlimited, because everyone has the right to vote
Answer:
NEGATIVE! NOOO -
Explanation:
Speech should not be restricted simply because it can be misinterpreted by others. If this is the criteria for restricting speech, then all speech can potentially be restricted since speech can easily be misconstrued.
Your welcome !
If the Federal Government were able to regulate commerce within a state, there would possibly be a <u>clash of interests</u>.
<h3>
Trade within a
State</h3>
The United States was formed in such a way that there was an internal state government and a federal government that could implement general policies of common application.
Since the federal government has a different view of trade than the state does, an inclusion of the federal government would cause a <u>clash of interests</u> due to the different views among them.
If you want to learn more about Federal Government, you can visit the following link: brainly.com/question/371257
Yes this is true, all of that would be considered earth science.
