Answer: function 1
Rate of change of function 1:
Following the format of y=mx+c, the rate of change should be m, so, the rate of change for function 1 = 4
To find the gradient (rate of change):
The two points the line passes through are (x1, y1) and (x2, y2), which in this case is (1, 6) and (3, 10)
(Doesn't matter which is which but you need to make sure that once you decide which is which, you stick to it)
To calculate the gradient, you substitute these values following (y1 - y2)/(x1 - x2)
Gradient of function 2 = (10 - 6)/(3 - 1)
= 2
Therefore, since 4 > 2, rate of change of function 1 > rate of change of function 2.
Fssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss dsffffsd xdgs
Answer:❤❤❤
Step-by-step explanation:
The shape of distribution for a polygon of the average annual rainfall in Los Angeles over the past 110 years would be normal.
<h3>How to determine the
shape of
distribution?</h3>
In Statistics, the shape of distribution of a data set can be determined by examining the frequency distribution, which explicitly shows the number of score or numerical data associated with each member of a population.
Over the past 110 years, we can logically deduce that the shape of distribution for a polygon of the average annual rainfall in Los Angeles would be normal because very few number of years had extremely low rainfall, high rainfall and many years with average rainfalls.
Read more on frequency distribution here: brainly.com/question/20744563
#SPJ1
