It was August 7, 1964 when the Gulf of Tunkin
Resolution passed by the US Congress right after the alleged attack on two US
naval destroyers stationed off the coast of Vietnam. The Gulf of Tonkin
Resolution viably propelled America's full-scale inclusion in the Vietnam War.
Though there is no formal declaration of war, this also gave President Johnson
approval "to take all necessary steps, including the use of armed force,
to assist any member or protocol state of the Southeast Asia Collective Defense
Treaty requesting assistance in defense of its freedom." This has been
used by Johnson and Pres. Richard Nixon as a justification for escalated
involvement in Indochina.
The negative effects of considering political leanings when selecting Supreme Court Justices include:
- The risk of bias
- The possibility of selecting an unqualified an inexperienced person
<h3>What are political leanings?</h3>
In the U.S., some people belong to the conservative political group while others belong to the liberal or democratic group.
It is wrong to select a Supreme Court Justice on any of these basis because the emotion is a major player that can lead to the wrong choices.
In such cases, the qualifications of the candidates might be overlooked due to bias.
Learn more about political leanings here:
brainly.com/question/1470181
#SPJ1
Answer:
William Edward Burghardt Du Bois February 23, 1868 -- August 27, 1963 was an American sociologist, socialist, historian, civil rights activist, Pan-Africanist, author, writer and editor. Born in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, Du Bois grew up in a relatively tolerant and integrated community, and after completing graduate work at the University of Berlin and Harvard, where he was the first African American to earn a doctorate, he became a professor of history, sociology, and economics at Atlanta University. Du Bois was one of the founders of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in 1909.
Explanation:
Answer:
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Explanation:
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws
