Answer:
betttt
Explanation:
Howdy my names is Danny, I live in Texas oh and boy is it hot. I got a new job as the towns sheriff this is a tough job because a lot of crimes happen here in Texas especially at the bars. I eat a lot of beans, hard biscuits, dried meat, dried fruit, and coffee. Occasionally, a type of bread known as pan de campo.
My life in Texas is pretty rough because Its really hot and hard to find some water. My job is sometime its kind of easy because bounty hunters do half of my job because they catch some of the most wanted criminals with just a little bit of cash. I just got a new male horse called SKY he is a Secretariat he is really strong and powerful. I just partnered up with a bounty hunter to catch the most wanted criminals in Texas, we went on a trip to find the criminals and we found them camping in the middle of nowhere and me and my partner decided to attack them in the morning because we were tired and so were the horses. As soon as the sun came out we attacked the gang of criminals we captured each criminal and brought them back to the jail. Well I gotta do more work in the town folks so ill have to catch ya later yehawwww.
Answer:
40 acres in total, but the park in Quincy was set on 13 acres
Explanation:
John Adams was a second president of the United States, and also a very good in law, and he had in his possession one big property of 40 acres, in the state of Massachusetts, the property known under the name of Peacefield. He was born in Massachusetts, where he also inherited his big property. Those 40 acres belonged to his great grandfather, who moved to England.
Answer for your first question:
- Separation of powers refers to each branch of government having their own distinct powers, while checks and balances refers to the ability of each branch to prevent another branch from becoming too powerful.
For your second question:
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/8033338#readmore
<em>[Proper form on Brainly is to ask just one question per post.]</em>
<u>Explanation in regard to your first question:</u>
The "separation of powers" principle was an idea embedded into the plans for American government by our founding fathers, based on their reading of Enlightenment political theory. The terminology "separation of powers" was introduced by Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron of Montesquieu. (Usually he's referred to as just "Montesquieu.") He wrote an important work of political theory called <em>The Spirit of the Laws</em>, published in 1748.
Within his treatment of how governments will function best, Montesquieu argued that executive, legislative, and judicial functions of government ought to be divided between parts of the government, so that no one person or division of the government can infringe on the overall rights of others in the government or of the members of the society overall. The framers of the United States Constitution embedded the separation of powers into the plan for US government.
As noted by <em>The History Channel, </em> "In addition to this separation of powers, the framers built a system of checks and balances designed to guard against tyranny by ensuring that no branch would grab too much power." Some examples of the checks and balances used would be:
- Congress (the Legislative Branch) controls the government's budget, so the Executive Branch needs Congress's support to fund any of its desired initiatives.
- The President nominates federal officials, but those nominations must be confirmed by the Senate.
- The President has the ability to veto laws passed by Congress, requiring a two-thirds majority to override his veto.
- The Supreme Court and other federal courts (the Judicial Branch of government) can rule that laws passed by Congress or executive orders by the President are unconstitutional, blocking their implementation.
<span>In Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement (1992) the Supreme Court struck down requiring a fee for public demonstrations, the Supreme Court struck down an ordinance that allowed an administrator to charge a higher permit fee to groups whose march would likely require more police protection.</span>
