I’m pretty sure a question that you can’t answer
Answer:
He uses a previous status of African Americans as evidence.
Explanation:
The reason Judge Taney's arguments are ineffective is because he uses a previous status of African Americans as evidence which is not admissible because it is a previous status and not a current one.
Judge Taney wants to derive the and make certain the status of African Americans and how it is translated according to the Constitution to ascertain the rights and privileges they should enjoy which rendered his arguments ineffective.
Banning all alcoholic advertising might help to decrease underage drinking, but not necessarily. Many cases of underage drinking comes from peer pressure of other teens, some being older, as a way to get kids to "prove" themselves. Stopping commercials that advertise drinking may reduce the amount teens do it, because they see it less often and don't think about alcohol as much. This may also be a backfire because it becomes something less seen and there for more desirable for teen rebels to try. The best way to find middle ground is to keep these commercials on more adult based channels to avoid encouraging underage drinking.
I think that 20% of smokers wanting to quit smoking would be too narrow because that is only 20 people out of 1,000,000 that want to quit smoking versus 90% of people that would lie to quit.
Globe Theater............
