The first selection can be any one of the 8.
For each one ...
The second selection can be any one of the remaining 7.
For each one ...
The third selection can be any one of the remaining 6.
For each one ...
The fourth selection can be any one of the remaining 5.
Total number of ways to select four = (8 x 7 x 6 x 5) = 1,680 ways
BUT ... There are not 1,680 different groups of 4 .
Each group of 4 can be selected in (4 x 3 x 2) = 24 different ways.
So, although there are 1,680 different ways to select 4 singers,
there are only
(1,680 / 24) = 70 different groups of 4
that you can end up with.
STEP-BY-STEP EXPLANATION:
Given information
The given ordered point = (5, 0)
Step 1: We need to translate the point 4 units down
To translate down means we will be subtracting a value from the y--axis
Hence, we have

When translated 4 units down, we got (5, -4)
Step 2: Reflect over the y-axis
The general rule for reflecting over the y-axis is (-x, y)
This means the value of x will be negated and the value of y will remain the same

Step 3: the graph the point
Answer:
Th computed value of the test statistic is 3.597
Step-by-step explanation:
The null and the alternative hypothesis is as follows:
Null Hypothesis:
the population correlation coefficient is equal to zero
the population correlation coefficient is not equal to zero
The test statistics for Pearson correlation coefficient is thus computed as :

where;
r = correlation coefficient = 0.60
n = sample size = 25
So;



t = 3.597
Comparing to a critical value of t (23 degrees of freedom two-tailed value) = 2.069
Decision Rule:
Since computed value of t is greater than the critical value of t; We reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis.
Conclusion:
We conclude that the population correlation coefficient significantly differs from 0 at 5% (0.05) level of significance.